Date: January 23, 2018
Tags: cluster, DataKeeper Cluster Edition, disaster recovery, Live Migration, Microsoft, Quick Migration, recovery, virtualisation, VMware, vsphere disaster recovery options
Are Vmware’s Vsphere Disaster Recovery Options Really Better Than Microsoft’s Options For Hyper-V?
Every article I read about virtualization and disaster recovery says VMware has a more robust DR solution than Microsoft. Well, I’d like to challenge that assumption. From the view where I sit, this is actually one of the areas where Microsoft has a major competitive advantage at the moment. Here is how I see it.
VMware Site Recovery Manager
This is an optional additional add on that rides on the back of Array based replication solutions. The recovery point objective is good due to the array based replication. The RTO is measured in hours, not minutes. Add in the fact that moving back to the primary data center is a very manual procedure. It basically requires that you re-create your jobs in the opposite direction. The complete end to end recovery operation of failover and failback could take the better part of a day or longer.
Microsoft Multi-Site Cluster
Virtual machine HA clustering is included with the free version of Hyper-V Server 2008 R2, as well as with Windows Server 2008 Enterprise and Datacenter editions. In order to do multi-site clusters, it requires array based replication or host based replication solutions that integrate with Windows Server Failover Clustering. With a multi-site cluster, failover is measured in minutes (just about the time it takes to start a VM) and can be used with array based replication solutions such as EMC SRDF CE or HP MSA CLX or the much less expensive host based replication solutions such as SteelEye DataKeeper Cluster Edition.
Not only is failover quick with Hyper-V multi-site clusters, measured in just a few minutes. Failback is also quick and seamless as well. Add in support for Live Migrations or Quick Migration across Data Centers. I think this is one area that Microsoft actually has a much more robust solution than VMware Vsphere Disaster Recovery Options. Maybe it does not included automated DR tests, but when you consider you can failover and failback all in under 10 minutes, maybe an actual DR test performed monthly would give you a much better indication of what to expect in an actual disaster?
If you want a Hyper-V solution more like SRM, then there is an option there as well. It is called Citrix Essential for Hyper-V. But much like SRM, it is an optional add-on feature. It really doesn’t even match the RPO and RTO features that you can achieve with basic multi-site clusters for Hyper-V.
What do you think? Am I wrong or is there something I just don’t get? From my view, Hyper-V is heads and shoulders above Vsphere Disaster Recovery Options.